Five star reviews — Abigail Abernathy: All-Night Analytical Engine Analyst by T. R. Goodman
The description, via Goodreads:
All Abigail Abernathy wants is a respectable job where she can put her knowledge of analytical engines to use. The Royel Trading Company of Bristol provides her with just such an opportunity, but not everyone is pleased to have her aboard. Between incompetent management, clients helpless beyond her imagination, and a disgruntled former analytical engine analyst who will stop at nothing to take back the job she unknowingly took from him, will her credulity, not to mention her sanity, be up to the task? It’s going to be a long night.
Abigail Abernathy: All-Night Analytical Engine Analyst is a steampunk short story about 5,000 words in length.
And my review:
This was a very interesting little story. The setting was believably Victorian with the social norms of that period accurately portrayed. The characters were all unique and . . . well, likeable is probably the wrong word for one, but I guess he was likeable as a character, if not as a person. The plot was intriguing, and certainly not quite what I was expecting from the beginning. But perhaps the best part were the problems she had to deal with that weren’t related to the main plot, problems that I’m pretty sure anyone who’s ever worked in tech support or similar, or knows anyone who has and has heard them ranting, can identify with . . . except steampunk era style.
There’s not really much else I can say about this story, since it was only 5000 words. One of these days I’ll get around to buying and reading it’s sequel.
Related articles
Freedom of speech does not mean freedom from criticism
I had another post I was working on for tonight, but I saw this on twitter and it seemed far more important than my blatherings about the different definitions of space opera.
Now, I admit, my French isn’t up to translating the cartoons, nor do I know enough about French or Muslim culture to know just how offensive these are, but the point is good, nonetheless.
And before any idiot says it, I am not condoning murder. I’m just agreeing that this isn’t a black and white situation. It’s not “cartoonists = good; murderers = bad” thing. BOTH were bad. Yes, murder is far worse. But being murdered for it doesn’t make what the cartoonists did right either.
Does it matter who I am?
I keep seeing people saying things like “I just can’t watch The Cosby Show any more now that I know Bill Cosby sexually assaulted all those women!”* and “I can’t watch Firefly any more now that I know that Adam Baldwin is so ((insert various terms here, as he is not shy about stating his opinions regardless of how stupid/unpopular they are.))”
This makes no sense to me. Ender’s Game is still on my to read list despite me finding Orson Scott Card’s statements about homosexuals extremely offensive. I can still enjoy Firefly despite knowing that Baldwin apparently wasn’t acting when he played Jayne. I can still read books by one of my new favorite authors despite having had to unsubscribe from her blog because of my feelings about her political posts. My enjoyment of a work has nothing to do with who created it.
Usually, anyway. There are exceptions. I research authors before I read near future military sf after one too many books that had lines like “That’s what liberals never understood during the Iraq War” (almost a direct quote from one, by the way) followed by a tirade about how liberals are a drain on everything that’s right and good about America. If they list certain other authors as major influences/friends or anything like that, I don’t even bother with trying the book. But that’s less a “who they are/what they believe/what they’ve done upsets me” thing and more a “I don’t like getting lectured about how horrible I am in fiction” thing. Really, if I’d ever seen it handled without becoming a serious case of Writer on Board, I might not have this policy.
Also, there are authors I’ve tried just because they seemed like such awesome people. Patrick Rothfuss is the only one that comes to mind right now . . . I was very impressed by what he does with Worldbuilders and by his sense of humor . . . but I’m pretty sure there’ve been others. Oh, right! I’m sure I’m far from the only person who first tried a John Scalzi novel after reading his blog. But, despite loving the blogs of both of them, I gave Name of the Wind five stars and Old Man’s War only three. My enjoyment of either book had nothing to do with my feelings about the man who wrote it.
You see, when I read I’m not thinking about anything other than the words on the page and the story they’re telling me. I don’t care if the author is a blue wombat from Alpha Centauri. I care about the book they’ve written. Likewise when I’m watching a TV show or movie I don’t care who the actors are; I care about the characters they’re portraying. When I watch The Cosby Show I’m not thinking about Bill Cosby, I’m thinking about Heathcliff Huxtable. When I watch Firefly I’m not thinking about Adam Baldwin and how much I’d like to smack him, I’m thinking about Jayne Cobb and how much I’d like to shove him out an airlock. When I read Name of the Wind I wasn’t thinking about the awesome guy who wrote it, I was thinking about Kvothe.
I know there’s a school of thought out there that says I’m wrong and that authors and actors always put so much of themselves into characters that in some way they are the same. To some extent I suppose it’s true. No one is creative enough to be someone completely unlike themselves. But, for the most part, this quote by S. M. Stirling sums things up well: “There is a technical term for someone who confuses the opinions of a character in a book with those of the author. That term is idiot.” The inverse is also true. Yes, maybe it’d help you understand my books better, or at least why they contain things they do, if you knew my political beliefs or religion or sexuality, or even whether I prefer ham or turkey. But you should still be able to enjoy them without knowing any of that, and even if what you do know of that you find offensive. Because Jake, Lyndsey, Renata, Bobby, Viktor . . . none of them are me. I’m not writing autobiography. I’m writing fiction. That means I get to make shit up.
* We will not be getting into the bigger issue of him not having actually been found guilty yet, because the whole thing about how innocent until proven guilty doesn’t apply to people accused of certain crimes is not something I feel like getting into today.
Intertwined Lives Excerpt and Update
This was supposed to be my WIP list post, but since all I’ve worked on since the last one is Intertwined Lives that seemed kind of daft to bother with. Intertwined Lives is now 34,442 words. I’m two weeks into a plot that will cover two years. I’m pretty sure I’m looking at a George R. R. Martin length thing here. Oh well.
(Random oddness: A suggested related article is a recipe for red velvet cake with cream cheese icing. What the fuck is this thing smoking lately?!)
Synopsis:
Kayden, Richie, Quinn, and Rusark couldn’t be more different. One’s a future stay-at-home Dad, one’s a minor rock star, one’s a rebel-for-hire, and one’s the newest officer in the Sweytzian Special Forces. One’s quiet and shy, one’s outgoing and hyper, one’s suave and charming, and one’s forthright and pragmatic. This book follows their four, very different, stories as they simply live their lives, lives that intertwine because of family, friendship, and love.
This is a story for everyone who’s ever wondered what the heroes do when they’re not saving the day. This is a story for everyone who’s ever wondered what the ordinary people in a society with epic heroes are like.
And the excerpt, from the chapter introducing Richie and his daughters:
Somewhere out there in the tri-galaxies, one of my older sisters was headed home after fighting to free a world from a tyrant. Somewhere out there, one of my other older sisters was headed home after a bit of smuggling. I, on the other hand, was in the nursery of my own house, trying to convince my daughters to take a nap.
“Izzy, c’mon, sweety. I know you’re tired,” I said, putting her in bed for the fourth time in a nulair. “Boris is sleepy,” I said, handing her her pale purple stuffed luriset. “Why don’t you cuddle him?”
“Rosie’s up!” she argued.
“Only because you kept poking her,” I said, fighting the perfectly understandable urge to throttle my eldest daughter. She wasn’t feeling the slightest bit of remorse for waking her sister up. “Now, back in bed, both of you. You need to be well rested for tonight. We’re going to my parents’ house for dinner. You don’t want to be too sleepy to enjoy that, do you?”
“Don’t wanna sleep with her!” Rosie said, clutching the pink stuffed dragon she carried with her everywhere to her chest. “She’s meanie!”
“Fine then. You can go nap on my bed. Izzy . . . Rosie, what’s wrong, sweety?” I asked, having felt fear from my baby girl and caught a glimpse of her thoughts. There was something about monsters in them, but I couldn’t make sense out of them beyond that. There are times being only a quarter-Magvinnian is really annoying.
Rosie started to speak at the same time I noticed Izzy running off. “Isabella Gwenneth Reddige-Fine, get your butt back in here!”
Izzy looked at me and apparently decided she didn’t like what she saw, as she climbed wordlessly back into bed. “You’re cranky,” she informed me.
“Because you’re being a brat today. Now, Rosie, what’s scaring you, baby girl?”
“Monsters under bed!” she yelled, clutching her dragon tighter.
I sighed heavily, wishing once again that I was telepathic enough to know who was to blame for this. “Why do you think that?”
“James said so!”
I silently swore to kill my younger brother then said, “James is wrong. Come with me, and we can look under the bed, okay? Or you can climb up there next to your sister and sleep in here.”
She chose her sister over the monsters. “Monsters eat little girls. Izzy just pokes,” she informed me, as she scooted as far away from her sister as she could.
I ran my hands through my hair and shook my head as I walked back down to the living room.
Five star reviews — Tsar Wars (Agents of ISIS #1) by Stephen Goldin
This is a book I read because the sample made me want to know more about the setting, the characters, and just what the heck was going on.
Also, the series title seems a bit unfortunate now. This is space opera with no connection to any real world groups, so nobody judge me or the author just because of it, okay?
The description, via Goodreads:
Welcome to the first great space opera decalogy of the twenty-first century! Agents of ISIS is the 21st century re-envisioning of the Family d’Alembert series by its original author, an epic saga describing the fight to preserve humanity from the forces of chaos and destruction.
With humanity scattered across the galaxy on hundreds of worlds, the Empire is the only force for order across the stars. Without it, interstellar conflicts would bring chaos and billions of deaths.
But the tsar has been in a coma for five years now, and his grand-niece, the only apparent heir, is only 14 years old. In this hour of crisis, the task of preserving the Empire falls to two untrained–but far from unskilled–agents of the Imperial Special Investigation Service. Can they make a difference against the vast forces arrayed against them?
And my review,which the author appears to have liked since a quote from it appears in the front matter of the new edition:
What stands out the most to me in this book is the characters. They’re all very distinctive and very entertaining/horrifying/whatever words suits that character the best. They felt real, which is something I personally love in a book. The dialogue also felt natural and appropriate to each characters’ personality.
The plot was fairly predictable in some ways, but not enough to be annoying. That they were going to get from A to B was certain; it was clearly that kind of book; but how they got there was frequently a nice surprise.
I have a minor complaint: A dictionary of the Yiddish terms would’ve been nice, as Google is letting me down on some. Other than that, this is best space opera I’ve read in ages.
An interesting thing about posting this reviews on my blog so very long after I write them is that it gives me time to reflect on the book some. This one my recollections of prove something Larry Hama once said about how people don’t remember plots, they remember characters. Tomorrow it will have been six months since I finished the book. I remember the characters vividly, but only the most exciting and interesting bits of the plot. This is still the best space opera I’ve read in ages, and the sequel is very high up in my 1300+ item “to read” list.
Why I failed Nanowrimo, and how I’ll be doing things going forward
I failed at Nanowrimo this year, but I’m okay with this.
There are reasons I could have failed that I wouldn’t be okay with, things that would boil down to just laziness, but that wasn’t the case this time. True, there may have been a day or two in there where I played around on Flight Rising when I could’ve been writing, but that’s it, just a day or two.
I failed for the following reasons:
First, because I spent the first week, week and a half, of November sick, sick enough that had I had a “real” job, I probably would’ve called in for at least some of those days. I know there are authors who say writing isn’t a job you can take even a day off from regardless of how bad you feel. Those authors have never read the kind of crap I come up with when sick. I’m not talking bad punctuation, I’m talking adding honest-to-Gygax liches and dungeon crawls to Star Wars sort of crap, to use an example from a game I GMed.
Second, because I choose a bad story to do something like Nanowrimo with. Not, I must say, because it was so complex like someone on the forums warned me about when I mentioned it. No, the problem was that I had far more of it already written in various forms so a great deal of what I was doing was rewriting, which is a more time and brain power consuming process. Just writing I can do very quickly. The parts of Intertwined Lives where I’m making new shit up tend to go very fast, unless they’re the ones from Kayden’s viewpoint, but the bits where I’ve got to read what I already have, figure out what of it to keep and what to trash, fix narration since the previous is in third-limited over the shoulder of a character who’s not one of the narrators of this, and so on, those bits are going very slowly indeed. I can’t just skip them and come back to them later because what exactly happens in them will have major ramifications later.
Third, and probably most importantly, I learned that I’m just not the kind of writer who can make the actual writing career part the most important aspect of her life. Actually, I’ve been learning this one slowly since May.
You see, I released Jake’s Last Mission in April and, to put it mildly, it didn’t sell well. So, I did research and embarked on a quest to get it reviews to help it sell. Well, the easiest way to do that was review exchanges and review groups. So from May through September or October I spent hours each day reading books I didn’t necessarily have any interest in, or at least not enough to have voluntarily kept reading, so I’d get reviews. In the future I’ll stick to one-on-one review exchanges so I can control what I read and so there’ll be, hopefully, less mismatch between what a reviewer’s expecting from my story and what it delivers, because this was helpful, but not as helpful as it could’ve been and the toll on my life was not worth it. Reading shouldn’t be a chore and this was making it one.
I also started trying to update this blog twice a week, do networky stuff everyday, and other things like that. Meanwhile, I kept wondering why I never seemed to get any writing done any more.
I’ve figured it out. Reading books I’m not interested in to review them, updating my blog according to the schedule I worked out instead of just whim, networking more than clicking Like or whatever on amusing things . . . that’s taxing for me. That’s far, far harder than sitting down and churning out a few thousand words. Yes, I know it’s important and if I never do it I’m never going to sell and all that shit. I don’t care any more! First of all, I’m pretty sure that’s bullshit. I’m not selling because I’m writing space opera novellas. It’s that simple. My wife writes teen romance novels that sell well with pretty much no promotion. Science fiction readers are damned picky, and novellas don’t sell well regardless of genre, according to surveys I’ve seen. So, oh well.
It’s not even a time thing, like it is for so many authors, which is why I thought I could do it since I don’t have a “real” job. For me, it’s an energy thing. It’s mentally exhausting to spend that much time each day as Shannon the Professional Author instead of Shannon the Person. They’re different. Shannon the Professional Author is, has to be, far more concerned with the ramifications of everything she does. She can’t make a comment on a famous author’s blog that’s got horrendous typoes in it, nor can she be as vitriolic as Shannon the Person gets. Mustn’t alienate potential readers! Checking my phrasing and spelling may only take a few more seconds, but it sometimes takes a not insignificant amount of mental energy to force myself to choose words that aren’t so loaded, to pay enough attention to my hastily typed comment to make sure I didn’t get “to” and “too” mixed up, etc. Combine that with the reading stuff I’m not really interested in to review it and trying to write blog posts when I don’t really feel like it just because it’s been so long, and by the time I can just sit down and write, I can’t. It’s not that I don’t feel like it, though that’s probably the phrase I’d use at the time. It’s that I can’t. I’ve used up too much mental energy and need to do something where I can just turn my brain off completely.
There’s also that by spending all my time and energy on that stuff, I wasn’t getting new material to work with.
Ray Bradbury said: “The time we have alone; the time we have in walking; the time we have in riding a bicycle; are the most important times for a writer. Escaping from a typewriter is part of the creative process. You have to give your subconscious time to think. Real thinking always occurs on the subconscious level.” I wasn’t getting that. By the time I’d recovered from the energy expenditure of networking and blog writing and reading books to review, it was too late to do anything. I tried, but mostly what I succeeded in doing was feeling guilty for the time I’d spent playing video games or reading books for fun instead of writing. Because everybody says you have to write every day, after all. I know that’s not true for me. I know I write best when I write only three or four days a week. But when I’m not even getting those three or four days, I feel horribly guilty regardless of the reason.
No more. My early New Year’s resolution is to stop letting what I should be doing according to experts if I want to treat my writing career like a real career rule my life.
I’m not going to adopt a write just when I feel like it thing. I know myself. I am lazy. I’ll never push past the hard parts if I don’t have a goal to shoot for. I also hate failing, so I’ll give myself a 20,000 word a month goal to shoot at, because I know I can do that easily, but I’ll no longer let myself feel bad over reaching it by writing 4,000 words a day for five days instead of 1,000 words a day for twenty days. So long as I’m not procrastinating and trying to get it all done in the last five days of the month, it’s fine.
I’ll still do detailed reviews of some books I read, including, of course, the two I’ve agreed to review that I still haven’t, but if I feel like leaving just a one sentence “This was pretty good, but overrated” sort of review, I’ll do that instead. I also will not be making myself read everyday whether I feel like it or not. Reading should not be a chore, as I said above.
I’ll try to update this blog at least once a week with the regularly scheduled stuff, but actual posts will be done when I have something to say, so some weeks there might be five, some there might be none. I’ve put off writing some stuff I wanted to for it because I’d already made a post that week. That’s fucking stupid. If I’ve got something I want to say, why not just go ahead and say it then?
And, above all else, I’ll try to remember that even the days where I don’t do anything related to my writing career are still days I spend working on it, because even a day spent, as the day before yesterday was, reading the truth behind comic book urban legends contributes in some way to what I later write. In this case, it made me think about what’s really important in adaptations of works, why I like X-Men: Days of Future Past but would like to string up everyone responsible for the a made-for-TV version of Little House on the Prairie I saw once where Ma told Pa she would divorce him if he insisted they move to Oregon. I’m not sure I can manage to explain this well, but it boils down to “There’s a core at the heart of every character and story that you shouldn’t violate.” And that is useful for my writing because some Universal Nexus stories originate in the long-running rpg version of the setting. There are always differences in the final story and the game, but the core is always there. Stolen Time had, I think, two lines of dialogue and the overall plot in common with what happened in-game. The core of the characters and the story itself was the same though, so it worked. And I know by admitting that I borrow from rpg sessions I’ve just lost some potential readers. To them I say “Go fuck yourself. Take your pretentious attitude elsewhere.”
How Do You Choose What To Read?
As part of learning how best to market my books, I’ve read many things that purport to tell how people choose books. The fact that none of these reports, blogs, etc. say the same thing makes all of them a bit suspect, to my mind. The one I remember clearest right now said that a person had to hear of a book a certain number of times before they’d but it; another that the important thing was to sell yourself not the book; some insisted covers were more important than content . . . you get the idea.
So I got to thinking about the last things I’ve read that weren’t assigned for a review group and why I read them:
- Three different M.C.A. Hogarth short stories: One was a reread, the other two were because I enjoyed that one so much. So, why did I read the first one in the first place? It was free, by a self-published author — we need to support each other, and the premise sounded interesting.
- The Name of the Wind: I saw Patrick Rothfuss on Tabletop and was amused so I found his blog and was amused and very impressed by his way with words, so I read the blurb and sample and then some reviews to make sure the book didn’t start out good but end up horrible and then bought the book.
- The newest InCryptid short story: I’ve been an InCryptid fan since I read the first book after the author described the main character as the daughter of Batman and Dazzler. I discovered the livejournal post where she said this when a friend commented on someone’s reblogging of it on Facebook. I don’t think Facebook shows me friends’ comments on other people’s posts any more, so this avenue of discovery is closed. What keeps me coming back? The characters are competent, amusing, and flawed — just like real people.
- The most recent issues of G.I. Joe A Real American Hero: I’ve covered before how very long ago I fell in love with Larry Hama‘s story-telling. So I guess the question here is what keeps me coming back every month. And that’s a question with an easy answer: characterization. Scarlett, Snake Eyes, Duke, Stalker, Storm Shadow . . . they feel more real than some people.
- Self-published novel I won’t name because I don’t recommend it: The blurb made it sound really good and it was free and self-published.
Reading over that list, it looks like for me the key to getting me to read your book in the first place is to make it sound interesting — and there’s no way I could make a list of what criteria do that as sometimes I’m not sure myself what makes one book’s blurb appeal to me while another’s doesn’t — and the key to making me come back is to give me competent, interesting characters; characters that might score high on Mary Sue tests, but who are flawed enough that you still can empathize with them.
Hmm, a list of how I choose to read a book would look like this:
- Blurb sounds like it’ll be an interesting book.
- Sample has interesting characters, good world-building is a plus, but I can overlook it a bit for characters.
- Sample doesn’t have many terrible grammar errors.
- There aren’t a lot of reviews saying things like “The first 50 pages are great, but then it’s like the editor quit.” I have, unfortunately, read far too many books, both self and trad published, that have read like this.
- Cover, number of reviews, who the author is, all that other stuff some people will tell you is so all-fired important
So, what about you? How do you choose what you’ll read? What keeps you buying an author’s work?